Winston Churchill was such a man and his inspirational quality owed its dynamic force to the romantic world of phantasy in which he had his true being." She needed a prophet, a heroic visionary, a man who could dream dreams of victory when all seemed lost. … In that dark time, what England needed was not a shrewd, equable, balanced leader. But as Anthony Storr writes: "In 1940 Churchill became the hero that he had always dreamed of being. Macaulay's account of the Duke of Marlborough by writing a multivolumed Life of his distinguished ancestor (completed in 1938).Ĭhurchill's record both before 1939 and after 1945 was for the most part undistinguished. But now historians are beginning to reassess his career in just the same way as Churchill himself tried to revise T.
Until recently his reputation during the years from 1940 onward was scarcely questioned.
That he was a political figure of enormous influence and importance, belonging in many ways to an age earlier than the 20th century, and that he fitted uneasily into the constraints of British party politics until his moment came in 1940 are not in doubt. Where he succeeded, and how much he personally had to do with that success, and where he failed, and why, remain to be established. Sir Winston Churchill's exact place in the political history of the 20th century is, and will continue to be, a subject of debate and polemical writing.
0 kommentar(er)
